Immigration policies: Collective responsibility
Tridivesh Singh Maini
The recent past has been a witness to the increasing rise of ‘economic-nationalism’, anti-immigration policies and increasing xenophobia. Countries which in the past have welcomed immigrants, and have been protagonists of Free Trade and open borders, while immensely benefitting from the same, are becoming more and more insular, while this point got strongly reiterated by the election of Donald Trump, whose campaign focused on these issues, as US President. Apart from the US, the UK, many of the EU member states, and Australia too are becoming more and more inward looking.
and Canada have tried to develop an alternative narrative while being open to immigrants, and opening their doors to refugees. Leaders of these countries; Justin Trudeau in Canada, like Angela Merkel deserve immense credit for exhibiting courage and conviction and not capitulating before populist and ultra nationalist sentiments.
Both Trudeau and Merkel have opened their doors to refugees, while Trudeau opened his country’s doors to nearly 40,000 Syrian refugees. After the US imposed a ban on immigrants from certain Muslim countries, he tweeted: ‘To those fleeing persecution, terror & war, Canadians will welcome you, regardless of your faith. Diversity is our strength #WelcomeToCanada.”
Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, in spite of scathing criticism for her decision to admit over 1 million refugees, since 2015, from Syria, Iran and Afghanistan has stuck to her guns. In an interview, the German Chancellor stated: ‘It was an extraordinary situation and I made my decision based on what I thought was right from a political and humanitarian standpoint,”
The rise of the extreme right AfD, which emerged as the third largest political outfit, which Merkel managed to win by a lesser margin has been attributed to Merkel’s open door policy.
Along with Macron and Trudeau, one more leader who is trying to offer an alternative narrative is the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan who has started a campaign, ‘London is Open’. Said Khan in his message: ‘…Many people from all over the globe live and work here, contributing to every aspect of life in our city. We now need to make sure that people across London, and the globe, hear that #LondonIsOpen…
It would be pertinent to point out, that while the rise of right-wing leaders like Trump and AfD in Germany is cited as one of the reasons for this growing insularity, even left leaning leaders have been equally inward looking, when it comes to economic and trade policies. One thing which was common between Trump and Bernie Sanders, was their economic policies, which found resonance with the working class.
While Trump has emerged as the mascot of ‘insularity’ and economic nationalism, it would be pertinent to point out, that not just the US, but other countries which have benefited from immigration, to have tended to look inwards on important issues.
Australia, which has opposed Trump’s withdrawal from the Trans Pacific Partnership TPP and has repeatedly spoken in favour of an ‘open’ Indo-Pacific, has brought in some tough laws to oppose immigration. This includes the abolition of the 457 Visa (for skilled migrants), replacing it with a new visa program which is far more stringent, and will make it tougher for workers from other countries.
Commenting on the abolition of the Visa, Australian PM, Turnbull stated: “The migration program should only operate in our national interest. This is all about Australia’s interest,” Mr Turnbull said.
The second point to bear in mind is that some countries have spoken vociferously in favour of trade agreements, and open borders, but have played it safe on important human rights issues and immigration. This includes not just Syrian refugees, but more recently the Rohingya Issue. If one were to take the case of ASEAN for instance, a number of member states including the Chair for 2018, Singapore have argued in favour of economic openness, and were critical of the US approach towards TPP. Yet, they have been cautious on the Rohingya Issue, not wanting to rub Aung San Suu Kyi the wrong way.
In conclusion, there cannot be a selective approach, countries which seek to benefit from globalization, need to be open to immigrants and at times shoulder onerous responsibilities. After all, it is not just immigrants who benefit economically, but countries which they have migrated too also benefit from their skills and productivity.
Secondly, an enlightened, liberal agenda cannot just be restricted to economic issues, important human rights issues, cannot be obliterated and must get the attention they deserve.
Third, it is pointless, to blame any one country or ideology for insularity, everyone shares collective responsibility for the same.
Published on: 14 December 2017 | The Himalayan Times
GET IN TOUCH